When to rely on deterministic checks
- Before major launches (new domains, new senders, BIMI go-live).
- During nightly drift monitoring to prevent policy regressions.
- When compliance or security needs exact remediation steps.
Monitoring stack comparison
Determine where deterministic checks, seed-based tools, and inbox simulations each fit in your deliverability strategy. Spoiler: you probably need a blend.
Capability comparison
| Capability | Deterministic (SendCheck) | Seed inbox tools | Inbox simulations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy accuracy | 100% alignment with SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI as published in DNS at query time. | Inference based on where seeds landed; prone to false negatives when seed pools are small. | Predictive scoring using historical data; may miss policy misconfigurations entirely. |
| Time to detect | Seconds—SendCheck can alert immediately after a DNS change or provider drift. | Hours to days depending on seed send schedules and inbox polling frequency. | Minutes to hours; relies on model refresh intervals. |
| Actionability | Provides copy-ready remediation records and change history. | Highlights deliverability drop but rarely specifies which policy broke. | Offers risk scores and heuristics; requires specialist interpretation. |
| Ongoing cost | Included in SendCheck plans with predictable pricing. | Higher cost due to inbox hosting and reputation management. | Subscription pricing, often bundled with other email analytics tools. |
Where seed-based tools still help
- Measuring inbox placement across regional ISPs.
- Spotting content or engagement-driven spam filtering.
- Validating warm-up and deliverability experiments.
Stack recommendation
Pair SendCheck (policy enforcement) with a seed tool (inbox placement) and, if volume demands it, a simulation product for predictive scoring. This covers infrastructure, content, and reputation in one stack.
Need help evaluating vendors?
We’ve benchmarked major deliverability tools. Share your requirements and we’ll send a tailored comparison.